Inside GNSS Media & Research

NOV-DEC 2018

Issue link: https://insidegnss.epubxp.com/i/1056692

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 26 of 59

www.insidegnss.com N O V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 8 InsideGNSS 27 well in the existing framework of criminal procedure. ere are various types of GPS investigations today and, regarding Issue 1, there are also many anticipations of decisions about each type of investigations that may come. Especially, as stated above, GPS investigations by using GPS functions with the target's smartphone are o•en conducted for the tracking of the target. e Japanese Supreme Court has not ruled on such type of investigations. Also, the type of investigation is greatly di-erent from the investigation conducted in this case, so the decision that may come cannot be directly based on the ruling in this case. erefore, it is necessary to €nd essence of this rul- ing. On the other hand, there is a possibility that such unclear conclusion has some e-ect on the industry. When police con- duct GPS investigations, they lease GPS terminals from a pri- vate company, like with this case. erefore this investigation has some industrial relevance to GPS terminal manufacturers and leasing businesses. If police hesitate to conduct GPS inves- tigation because of the decision, there is no denying that such industries are a-ected. Moreover, in the near future, a new law for GPS investiga- tion is going to be established in Japan and GPS investigation will be a promising method of investigation that will be com- monly used. However, the legislative bill for GPS investigation hasn't been settled until now. e law will need to keep the balance between the e‡ciency of GPS investigations and the protection of human rights. ere still are various opinions about speci€c items of the law, and building a consensus on this may be quite a future task. Currently, the Japanese judicial system is facing a big prob- lem about GPS investigations. Additional Resources 1. Horie, S., (2017): Memorandum of Supreme Court's Decision about GPS Inves- tigation, Quarterly Jurist, 2017, Summer/Number 22, 138-147 2. Inoue. M., (2017): No.30 GPS investigation, Extra Number Jurist No.222, 64-69 3. Ito, M., and T. Ishida (2017): Comments on Supreme Court Decisions; Jurist June 2017/Number 1507, 106-115 4. Pomfret, K., (2016). Implications of Evolving Expectations in the United States, Inside GNSS, September/October 2016, 46-49 5. Sasada, E., (2017). GPS Investigation and Article 35 of Constitution. Law Class, July 2017, Number 442, 123 6. Yamamoto, T., (2017): Aporia of the Decision about Illegal GPS Investigation?, Quarterly Jurist 2017 Summer/Number22, 148-155 Author and Column Editor Maria Taniuchi is a legal apprentice in Japan and graduated from Kyoto University law school. She has experience studying in Taiwan at the National Cheng-chi University. She worked at a global law œrm in Germany (Internship). Ingo Baumann is the editor of this column. His complete bio is on the œrst page. Create a GNSS RF I&Q or IF data le to simulate dierent tests at a set time and date anywhere in the world Now you can simulate the L2, L2C, and L5 signals Create multi-frequency, multi-constellation scenarios to develop and test dual frequency GNSS receivers Create a single scenario containing all the upper and lower L-Band signals for GPS, GLONASS, and BeiDou Use LabSat 3 Wideband to read RF data at up to 80 MB/s Record and replay up to 4 constellations and 20 satellite signals simultaneously with most GPS pseudorange residuals now at the sub-meter level NavtechGPS brings you ... LabSat 3 Wideband GNSS Simulator Your ONE source for GNSS products and solutions +1-703-256-8900 • 800-628-0885 www.NavtechGPS.com With the SatGen V3 update, one of the world's best GNSS simulators just got better! Ask us for a demonstration unit. If you try it, you will want to buy it.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Inside GNSS Media & Research - NOV-DEC 2018